I read an article recently on
President Obama’s growing public support of the gay marriage and I was struck
by the similarities between his involvement in the gay rights movement and
President Kennedy’s involvement in the civil rights movement. They followed similar paths that resulted in
the same outcome.
The
two Presidents were pressured by displays of public support of their respective
movements. President Kennedy did
not initially support the march on Washington because he feared that the march
would hurt the upcoming civil rights bill’s chances in Congress. He did work with the leaders of the
march to ensure that it would positively influence the bill. President Obama also initially avoided
federal support of gay marriage because he said it was a matter for the local
level. The gay rights movement,
however, has become more and more present in the media. Many celebrities, such as Neil Patrick
Harris, Ellen Degeneres, and Kelly McGillis, have come out to the public which
has inspired others to do the same or express their support for LGBT
people. There also campaigns such
as the Trevor Project and the It Gets Better Project that have increased
awareness and support of the movement.
Such public displays in support of the gay rights movement has
influenced President Obama’s campaign tactics.
Despite trying to avoid public
support of sensitive issues, both presidents ultimately expressed public
support for both of their causes on national television. President Kennedy
said, “Now the time has come for this nation to fulfill its promise. The events in Birmingham and elsewhere
have so increased the cries for equality that no city or state or legislative
body can prudently choose to ignore them.” It is interesting that President Obama uses the same foundational
argument of equality because he sees that the our nation has still not
fulfilled its promise to its gay citizens. Using similar language, he said in his inauguration speech,
“Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated
like anyone else under the law, for if we are truly created equal, then surely
the love we commit to one another must be equal as well.” President Obama's administration is even "urging the Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act." Two presidents, fifty
years apart, were (and are) fighting for equal rights. They were the most outspoken
Presidents for their respective movements, but could that be because they are
both minorities? President Kennedy was criticized for being Catholic just as
President Obama was (and is) criticized for being African-American. It took minority Presidents to publicly
and boldly fight for minority rights.
I feel like this is because it took someone who experienced prejudice to
be able to fight the prejudice being placed upon someone else.
In one of our readings, we saw that
Robert Kennedy said that he foresaw the United States having a black President
within the next forty years; his prediction was not far off. With the strides that are being made in
the gay rights movement by President Obama, I wonder if we could have a gay
President within the next forty-some-odd years. If we do, will our gay President make strides for equal
rights for another minority group?
As a former Eagle Scout, I for one am disgusted by the Boy Scouts of America's stance on refusing openly gay men to join the Boy Scouts. Two months ago, I sent them a letter saying that I was turning in my Eagle Scout badge and refused to associate myself with them until this ban was lifted.
ReplyDeleteAs you mentioned, Obama has taken a strong stance on gay rights, and just this past month, explicitly stated that the BSA should lift this ban. I quote, "My attitude is that gays and lesbians should have access and opportunity the same way everybody else does, in every institution and walk of life. The Scouts are a great institution that are promoting young people and exposing them to opportunities and leadership that will serve people for the rest of their lives. And I think nobody should be barred from that."
It is reassuring to hear that Obama supports true equality regardless of sexual preference not only under the legal system, but also in private organizations as well, and that he is not afraid to let organizations know what they should do in this regard.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIf we were to have a gay President within the next forty or so years, I would like to believe that (s)he would put forth an effort to aid another minority group. It would make sense, to say the least, that a person whom people were prejudiced against for their sexual preferences would attempt to "make strides for another minority group." In the movie "Milk", Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man to be elected to public office, said, "I'm a homosexual with power...that's scary." The fear of this could be the effect of an elected gay person's actions on those who do not share the same views. There will always be people who disagree on the rights of minorities, whether they are minorities in terms of race, economic status, or sexual preference. However, everybody-gay, straight, black, white, rich, poor, etc-is entitled to equal rights. If some time in the next forty years we have a gay President, I hope (s)he will go to great lengths to ensure equality for all people.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to try and determine how much of President Obama’s decision to focus on gay rights has been out of political pressure or out of a personal decision. As you stated in your entry, the President originally avoided public support of gay marriage. His May 2012 announcement was a major news story as it made him the first sitting president to publicly support gay marriage. I would definitely like to think that President Obama evolved his views on a moral decision rather than a strategic one.
ReplyDeleteIn response to your question, I think that a gay president is certainly possible within the next forty years. This year Tammy Baldwin was the first openly gay Senator elected, and I think that demonstrates that the general public is becoming more open not only to homosexual leadership but also to electing “minorities” in politics; women, African-Americans, etc.
My other hope is to see a female president, but even more, I hope for a future in which this won’t matter. Instead of describing President Obama as the first black president, or Hilary Clinton as a hopeful to be the first female president, I hope that they will be judged “not on the color of their skin” (or their gender or sexuality) “but on the quality of their character”.